1. What is the I&E survey
2. Conceptual rational for I&E survey
3. How I&E surveys contribute to WeD research
4. Description
5. How the I&E survey was developed
6. How the I&E survey was implemented
7. How the I&E surveys can be analysed
8. Links to other WeD research tools
9. Appendices restricted
access files.
Please contact Jane French [email protected]
Many of the links below
are to documents with restricted access. Please
contact For enquiries contact Jane
French [email protected] for
access to these.
1.
What is the I&E survey
The Income and Expenditure (I&E) survey has
been prepared to produce data on the income and expenditure patterns
of the household as a whole and on the individuals within it.
It is designed to capture data on the different categories of
incomes (self-employment, wage income, and in kind), expenditures
(production costs, food and non-food items), credit and saving
behaviour as well as subjective indicators as global happiness
and life domain satisfaction. The survey is also designed to
capture information on the extent of seasonal variations on income
and expenditure over one year.
Two different instruments are being used
to collect this information: a) a diary (Ethiopia, Thailand),
and b) a questionnaire (Bangladesh, Peru).
The different instruments have been devised to fit with other
aspects of
data collection
undertaken in the countries and hence also offer an opportunity
for comparative evaluation of the methods involved. The sample
selection has been informed by the results from the Resource
and Needs Questionnaire (RANQ ), either by using it as a
sampling frame for a random sample, or for an approach allowing
purposeful
sampling from categories of households according to objective
wellbeing indicators.
2. Conceptual rationale for I&E survey
The WeD Framework implies that there are three
basic categories of data that should be analysed: Having, Doing
and Thinking.
a) on what people/households/communities/nations have or do
not have (material and human resources, social relationships,
status)
b) on what people do or do not, or can or cannot do, with these
resources,
c) on how people think about what they have (do not have) and
can do (or not) with what they have. This encompasses how people
make or cannot make sense of what happens (meaning); explanations
of why people do what they do, and also (what we have thus far
been calling Quality of Life) how people judge, assess, and feel
about these things.
The RANQ survey was an initial survey to collect information
on households resources and needs. The need to keep it to a
manageable size meant that it was not possible to incorporate
income and expenditure data collection as well. It was therefore
decided to collect this data separately.
It is important though to have data on consumption measures
of poverty in order to be able to analyse them in relation to
measures of both objective and subjective wellbeing. However,
the particular country contexts being researched demonstrate
high degrees of seasonal variation. These result in fluctuations
in income and expenditure, which can have significant impacts
on measures of objective and subjective wellbeing. Concerns about
which households are able to effectively smooth their consumption
mean that capturing these fluctuations was considered to be of
major importance. Hence the design of the instrument is to capture
the data over a period of one year.
The Income and Expenditure survey therefore
provides information on what people do with their resources – the ‘flow’ data
to complement the ‘stock’ data provided by the RANQ which offers detailed information on households’ access
to and control over a wide range of resources, such as social,
natural, material, human and cultural resources, that influence
wellbeing outcomes.
3. How I&E surveys contribute
to WeD research
The Income and Expenditure Survey therefore serves
the following three purposes for the WeD research:
1. The collection of data including expenditure,
income, saving, credit, household decision making on the allocation
of income
and expenditure, and needs satisfaction amongst the households
and individuals in the research communities
2. The generation of data that can be used for comparative analysis
both within countries and potentially across the four countries
3. Development of instruments specifically designed for the study
of households livelihood strategies.
4. Description
The two instruments, the questionnaire (Bangladesh,
Peru) and the diary (Ethiopia, Thailand),
collect data on the following main aspects:
Section |
Questionnaire |
Diary |
• Updating household demographics (used in relation
to data collected by
the RANQ) |
* |
* |
• Income
Income from crops and livestock activities
Income from household enterprises
Income from wages and salaries
Income from rents and transfers |
*
*
*
*
|
*
*
*
*
|
• Expenditure
Food Expenditure
Non-food expenditure
Agricultural and livestock expenditure
|
*
*
*
|
*
*
*
|
• Expenditure decision and income management |
* |
* |
• Saving and credit |
* |
* |
• Need domain satisfaction and happiness |
* |
* |
Specific country issues
• Motives for consumption (Peru)
• Migration (Peru and Bangladesh)
• Employment and remittances (Bangladesh)
• Life events, health and illness, education/learning, rest and recreation,
social interaction with wider world, government officials, disagreements and
resolution (Ethiopia) |
|
*
|
5. How the I&E survey was developed
Before the survey instruments were administered,
they underwent a grounding and piloting phase within each of
the four countries. This involved the identification of the empirical
data required to address the conceptual issues; preparation of
the survey instrument for the collection of empirical data; selection
of the communities and households from which the data was to
be gathered, mainly informed by RANQ data, and the planning of
a data management system.
6. How the I&E survey was implemented
The implementation of the survey has proceeded
as follows in each of the WeD countries:
Bangladesh